Difference between revisions of "Conclusion"

From ECGpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|previouspage=Compare_the_old_and_new_ECG
 
|previouspage=Compare_the_old_and_new_ECG
 
|previousname=Step 7+1: Compare with previous ECG
 
|previousname=Step 7+1: Compare with previous ECG
|nextpage=
+
|nextpage=Finished!
|nextname=
+
|nextname=Finished!
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{authors|
 
{{authors|

Revision as of 14:47, 27 August 2007

«Step 7+1: Compare with previous ECG Finished!»


Author(s) J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD
Moderator J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD
Supervisor
some notes about authorship

Working through the seven steps, one still has to draw a final conclusion. The final conclusion is the starting point for further treatment of your patient.

Often it is not easy to conclude. Exemples are:

  • "Sinustachycardia with ST elevatie, likely be caused by acute myocardial infarction"
  • "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 beat per minute caused by an AV nodal re-entry"
  • "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with withening of the QRS complexes"
  • "Normal ECG"

Final conclusions should be made of one sentense, which sums all important aspects of the ECG. It is not nescecary to mention all 7 aspects, however one have to look at all of them to find the right conclusion!