Difference between revisions of "Conclusion"

From ECGpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{nav|
 +
|previouspage=Compare_the_old_and_new_ECG
 +
|previousname=Step 7+1: Compare with previous ECG
 +
|nextpage=
 +
|nextname=
 +
}}
 +
{{authors|
 +
|mainauthor= [[user:Drj|J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD]]
 +
|advisor=
 +
|coauthor=
 +
|moderator= [[user:Drj|J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD]]
 +
|editor=
 +
}}
 
Working through the seven steps, one still has to draw a final conclusion. The final conclusion is the starting point for further treatment of your patient.  
 
Working through the seven steps, one still has to draw a final conclusion. The final conclusion is the starting point for further treatment of your patient.  
  

Revision as of 14:47, 27 August 2007

«Step 7+1: Compare with previous ECG [[|»]]


Author(s) J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD
Moderator J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD
Supervisor
some notes about authorship

Working through the seven steps, one still has to draw a final conclusion. The final conclusion is the starting point for further treatment of your patient.

Often it is not easy to conclude. Exemples are:

  • "Sinustachycardia with ST elevatie, likely be caused by acute myocardial infarction"
  • "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 beat per minute caused by an AV nodal re-entry"
  • "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with withening of the QRS complexes"
  • "Normal ECG"

Final conclusions should be made of one sentense, which sums all important aspects of the ECG. It is not nescecary to mention all 7 aspects, however one have to look at all of them to find the right conclusion!