Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 50: Line 50:
*[[ICD]]] implantation can be considered for the prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with ARVC with extensive disease, including those with left ventricular involvement, 1 or more affected family member with SCD, or undiagnosed syncope when [[Ventricular Tachycardia|ventricular tachycardia]] or [[Ventricular Fibrillation|ventricular Fibrillation]] has not been excluded as the cause of syncope, who are receiving chronic optimal medical therapy, and who have reasonable expectation of survival with a good functional status for more than 1 y.
*[[ICD]]] implantation can be considered for the prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with ARVC with extensive disease, including those with left ventricular involvement, 1 or more affected family member with SCD, or undiagnosed syncope when [[Ventricular Tachycardia|ventricular tachycardia]] or [[Ventricular Fibrillation|ventricular Fibrillation]] has not been excluded as the cause of syncope, who are receiving chronic optimal medical therapy, and who have reasonable expectation of survival with a good functional status for more than 1 y.
*Radiofrequency [[ablation]] can be useful as adjunctive therapy in management of patients with ARVC with recurrent [[Ventricular Tachycardia|ventricular tachycardia]], despite optimal antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
*Radiofrequency [[ablation]] can be useful as adjunctive therapy in management of patients with ARVC with recurrent [[Ventricular Tachycardia|ventricular tachycardia]], despite optimal antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
==Referenties==
{{clr}}
{{clr}}
==Referenties==
<biblio>
<biblio>
#McKenna1994 pmid=8142187
#McKenna1994 pmid=8142187

Navigation menu