Conclusion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: De beoordeling van het ECG is niet klaar zonder een conclusie te trekken. Als je het 7 stappenplan doorlopen hebt, is het resultaat een opsomming van feiten, maar nog geen conclusie. Ieman...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Working through the seven steps, one still has to draw a final conclusion. The final conclusion is the starting point for further treatment of your patient. | |||
Often it is not easy to conclude. Exemples are: | |||
* "Sinustachycardia with ST elevatie, likely be caused by acute myocardial infarction" | |||
* "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 beat per minute caused by an AV nodal re-entry" | |||
* "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with withening of the QRS complexes" | |||
* "Normal ECG" | |||
Final conclusions should be made of one sentense, which sums all important aspects of the ECG. It is not nescecary to mention all 7 aspects, however one have to look at all of them to find the right conclusion! | |||
Revision as of 18:01, 28 May 2007
Working through the seven steps, one still has to draw a final conclusion. The final conclusion is the starting point for further treatment of your patient.
Often it is not easy to conclude. Exemples are:
- "Sinustachycardia with ST elevatie, likely be caused by acute myocardial infarction"
- "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 beat per minute caused by an AV nodal re-entry"
- "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with withening of the QRS complexes"
- "Normal ECG"
Final conclusions should be made of one sentense, which sums all important aspects of the ECG. It is not nescecary to mention all 7 aspects, however one have to look at all of them to find the right conclusion!