Pathologic Q Waves: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Chapter|Myocardial Infarction}}
{{Chapter|Myocardial Infarction}}
[[Image:PathoQ.png|thumb| A pathologic Q wave]]
[[Image:PathoQ.png|thumb| A pathologic Q wave]]
Pathologic Q waves are a sign of '''previous [[Myocardial Infarction|myocardial infarction]]'''. The are the result of absence of electrical activity. A myocardial infarction can be thought of as an elecrical 'hole' as scar tissue is electrically dead and therefore results in pathologic Q waves. Pathologic Q waves are not an early sign of myocardial infarction, but '''generally take several hours to days to develop'''. Once pathologic Q waves have developed they rarely go away. However, if the myocardial infarction is reperfused early (e.g. as a result of percutaneous coronary intervention) stunned myocardial tissue can recover and pathologic Q waves disappear. In all other situations they '''usually persist indefinitely'''.
Pathologic Q waves are a sign of '''previous [[Myocardial Infarction|myocardial infarction]]'''. They are the result of absence of electrical activity. A myocardial infarction can be thought of as an elecrical 'hole' as scar tissue is electrically dead and therefore results in pathologic Q waves. Pathologic Q waves are not an early sign of myocardial infarction, but '''generally take several hours to days to develop'''. Once pathologic Q waves have developed they rarely go away. However, if the myocardial infarction is reperfused early (e.g. as a result of percutaneous coronary intervention) stunned myocardial tissue can recover and pathologic Q waves disappear. In all other situations they '''usually persist indefinitely'''.


The precise criteria for pathologic Q waves have been debated. Here we present the latest definition as accepted by the ESC and ACC.<cite>Thygesen</cite>
The precise criteria for pathologic Q waves have been debated. Here we present the latest definition as accepted by the ESC and ACC.<cite>Thygesen</cite>
Line 15: Line 15:


For those interested: the [http://www.epi.umn.edu/ecg/mncode.pdf Minnesota Code Classification System for Electrocardiographic Findings] contains a very extensive definition of pathologic Q waves.  
For those interested: the [http://www.epi.umn.edu/ecg/mncode.pdf Minnesota Code Classification System for Electrocardiographic Findings] contains a very extensive definition of pathologic Q waves.  
The Novacode system further classifies ischemic abnormalities in patients with no known history of myocardial infarction:<cite>novacode</cite>
* High risk of ischemic injury/ Q wave MI:
** Major Q waves: Q >= 50ms or Q >= 40 ms AND R/Q < 4,
* Moderate risk of ischemc injury / possible Q wave MI:
** Q >= 30 ms and ST deviation > 0.20 mV (minor Q waves with STT abnormalities)
** Q >= 40 ms and ST deviation < 0.20mV (moderate Q waves without STT abnormalities)
* Marginal risk of ischemic injury / possible Q wave MI:
** Isolated T wave abnormalities
** Minor Q waves (shallow Q < 30ms) and ST deviation < 0.15 mV
* Low risk of ischemic injury
** No significant Q waves or STT abnormalities


{{clr}}
{{clr}}
Line 22: Line 34:
#Alpert pmid=10987628
#Alpert pmid=10987628
#Thygesen pmid=17951284
#Thygesen pmid=17951284
#novacode pmid=9682893
</biblio>
</biblio>

Navigation menu