Introduction to Arrhythmias: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Secondly it is important to assess the '''origin of the arrhythmia''': | Secondly it is important to assess the '''origin of the arrhythmia''': | ||
*If the QRS < 120ms (i.e. a narrow complex), then it is either a [[Sinus node rhythms and arrhythmias|sinus arrhythmia]], [[Supraventricular Rhythms|supraventricular rhythm]] or a [[Junctional Tachycardias|junctional tachycardia]]. In tachycardias, this [[Media:narrow_tachycardia_flow.png|'''flowchart''']] will lead to the right diagnosis.<cite>ESCnarrowQRS</cite> | *If the QRS < 120ms (i.e. a narrow complex), then it is either a [[Sinus node rhythms and arrhythmias|sinus arrhythmia]], [[Supraventricular Rhythms|supraventricular rhythm]] or a [[Junctional Tachycardias|junctional tachycardia]]. In tachycardias, this [[Media:narrow_tachycardia_flow.png|'''flowchart''']] will lead to the right diagnosis.<cite>ESCnarrowQRS</cite> | ||
*If the QRS > 120ms it is either a [[Ventricular Arrhythmias|ventricular tachycardia]] or a [[Supraventricular Rhythms|supraventricular rhythm]] with additional [[Intraventricular Conduction|bundle branch block]]. This is a challenging difficulty in arrhythmia diagnosis, therefore a [[media:wideQRS_tachycardia_flow.png|'''flowchart''']] might help, which incoporates the Brugada criteria for VT.<cite> | *If the QRS > 120ms it is either a [[Ventricular Arrhythmias|ventricular tachycardia]] or a [[Supraventricular Rhythms|supraventricular rhythm]] with additional [[Intraventricular Conduction|bundle branch block]]. This is a challenging difficulty in arrhythmia diagnosis, therefore a [[media:wideQRS_tachycardia_flow.png|'''flowchart''']] might help, which incoporates the Brugada criteria for VT.<cite>Brugada</cite> Another method to discriminate VT from SVT has been proposed by Vereckei et al.<cite>vereckei</cite> In the editorial on that paper an excellent review is given on the subject by Dendi and Josephson.<cite>dendi</cite> | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 10:14, 17 January 2008
Author(s) | J.S.S.G. de Jong | |
Moderator | J.S.S.G. de jong | |
Supervisor | ||
some notes about authorship |

Morphologic criteria to differentiate between SVT vs. VT in a wide complex tachycardia. This is part of the wide complex tachycardia flowchart
Arrhythmias (non-normal heart rhythms) can be a challenge to the person who tries to understand them. But with a systematical approach, diagnosis is often less difficult than it seems at the beginning.
First look at the heart rate:
- >100 bpm = tachycardia
- <60 bpm = bradycardia
- are there extra beats? -> Ectopic Beats
Secondly it is important to assess the origin of the arrhythmia:
- If the QRS < 120ms (i.e. a narrow complex), then it is either a sinus arrhythmia, supraventricular rhythm or a junctional tachycardia. In tachycardias, this flowchart will lead to the right diagnosis.[1]
- If the QRS > 120ms it is either a ventricular tachycardia or a supraventricular rhythm with additional bundle branch block. This is a challenging difficulty in arrhythmia diagnosis, therefore a flowchart might help, which incoporates the Brugada criteria for VT.[2] Another method to discriminate VT from SVT has been proposed by Vereckei et al.[3] In the editorial on that paper an excellent review is given on the subject by Dendi and Josephson.[4]
References
Error fetching PMID 14563598:
Error fetching PMID 2022022:
Error fetching PMID 17272358:
Error fetching PMID 17317697:
Error fetching PMID 2022022:
Error fetching PMID 17272358:
Error fetching PMID 17317697:
- Error fetching PMID 14563598:
- Error fetching PMID 2022022:
- Error fetching PMID 17272358:
- Error fetching PMID 17317697: