Ventriculophasic Reflex: Difference between revisions
m (New page: {{Chapter|Supraventricular Rhythms}} [[Image:ventrfascreflex.jpg|thumb| Ventriculophasic reflex during second degree AV block type I. The PP interval that follow upon the blocked sinus bea...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The baroreflex influences both the sinusnode and the AV node and thus both sinus rate and atrioventricular conduction can be influenced. | The baroreflex influences both the sinusnode and the AV node and thus both sinus rate and atrioventricular conduction can be influenced. | ||
{{clr}} | {{clr}} | ||
== References == | |||
<biblio> | |||
#Rosenbaum pmid=13231262 | |||
</biblio> | |||
<analytics uacct="UA-807577-6"></analytics> | |||
Revision as of 19:53, 23 July 2007
| This is part of: Supraventricular Rhythms |
Ventriculophasic reflex is a phenomenon that can be seen during AV block or during ventricular extrasystoles in bigemini. It describes the sinus arrhythmia that exists during a irregular rhythm. The phenomenon has been described by Erlanger and Blackman in 1910 [2]. Different theories have been postulated to explain the phenomenon (a.o. by Wenkebach), but the theory as published by Rosenbaum and Lepeschkin in 1955 [1] is the most accepted.
A positive chronotropic (accelerating) effect on the ventricular contraction is probably caused by stretch on the right atrium by contraction of the ventricles. A negative chronotropic effect (slows down) is probably caused by a vagal reflex caused by stimulation of the carotic arterial baroreceptors by the pressure wave. The result of these two effects determines whether the P-P interval that surrounds the extra beat is shorter or longer than the P-P interval that surrounds the missing beat.
The baroreflex influences both the sinusnode and the AV node and thus both sinus rate and atrioventricular conduction can be influenced.
References
- ROSENBAUM MB and LEPESCHKIN E. The effect of ventricular systole on auricular rhythm in auriculoventricular block. Circulation. 1955 Feb;11(2):240-61. DOI:10.1161/01.cir.11.2.240 |
<analytics uacct="UA-807577-6"></analytics>