Conclusion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
JPH Bergmans (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Often it is not easy to conclude. Exemples are: | Often it is not easy to conclude. Exemples are: | ||
* "Sinustachycardia with ST | * "Sinustachycardia with ST elevation, likely caused by acute myocardial infarction" | ||
* "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 | * "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 beats per minute caused by an AV nodal re-entry" | ||
* "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with | * "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with widening of the QRS complexes" | ||
* "Normal ECG" | * "Normal ECG" | ||
Final conclusions should | Final conclusions should consist of one sentence, which sums all important aspects of the ECG. It is not necessary to mention all 7 aspects, however one has to look at all of them to find the right conclusion! | ||
Revision as of 11:38, 13 June 2008
| «Step 7+1: Compare with previous ECG | Cases and Examples» |
| Author(s) | J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD | |
| Moderator | J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD | |
| Supervisor | ||
| some notes about authorship | ||
Working through the seven steps, one still has to draw a final conclusion. The final conclusion is the starting point for further treatment of your patient.
Often it is not easy to conclude. Exemples are:
- "Sinustachycardia with ST elevation, likely caused by acute myocardial infarction"
- "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 beats per minute caused by an AV nodal re-entry"
- "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with widening of the QRS complexes"
- "Normal ECG"
Final conclusions should consist of one sentence, which sums all important aspects of the ECG. It is not necessary to mention all 7 aspects, however one has to look at all of them to find the right conclusion!