Conclusion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|previouspage=Compare_the_old_and_new_ECG | |previouspage=Compare_the_old_and_new_ECG | ||
|previousname=Step 7+1: Compare with previous ECG | |previousname=Step 7+1: Compare with previous ECG | ||
|nextpage= | |nextpage=Cases and Examples | ||
|nextname= | |nextname=Cases and Examples | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{authors| | {{authors| | ||
Revision as of 14:47, 27 August 2007
| «Step 7+1: Compare with previous ECG | Cases and Examples» |
| Author(s) | J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD | |
| Moderator | J.S.S.G. de Jong, MD | |
| Supervisor | ||
| some notes about authorship | ||
Working through the seven steps, one still has to draw a final conclusion. The final conclusion is the starting point for further treatment of your patient.
Often it is not easy to conclude. Exemples are:
- "Sinustachycardia with ST elevatie, likely be caused by acute myocardial infarction"
- "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 beat per minute caused by an AV nodal re-entry"
- "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with withening of the QRS complexes"
- "Normal ECG"
Final conclusions should be made of one sentense, which sums all important aspects of the ECG. It is not nescecary to mention all 7 aspects, however one have to look at all of them to find the right conclusion!