MI Diagnosis in LBBB or paced rhythm: Difference between revisions

From ECGpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(ST segment depression in the right precordials is actually concordant, not discordant)
(Example also shows ST elevation > 5 mm in lead V3)
Line 8: Line 8:
==Examples==
==Examples==
<gallery>
<gallery>
Image:MI in LBBB 01.jpg|Acute myocardial infarction in in a patient with a pacemaker and LBBB. Concordant ST elevation in V5-V6 are clearly visible.
Image:MI in LBBB 01.jpg|Acute myocardial infarction in in a patient with a pacemaker and LBBB. Concordant ST elevation in V5-V6 are clearly visible. There is discordant ST segment elevation > 5 mm in lead V3.
Image:MI in LBBB 02.jpg|The same patient as in the first example 2 months before the myocardial infarction. Normal LBBB pattern.
Image:MI in LBBB 02.jpg|The same patient as in the first example 2 months before the myocardial infarction. Normal LBBB pattern.
</gallery>
</gallery>

Revision as of 21:34, 24 August 2007

In case of a left bundelbranch block (LBBB), infarct diagnostics based on the ECG is difficult. The baseline ST segments and T waves tend to be shifted in a discordant direction with LBBB, which can mask or mimic acute myocardial infarction. However, serial ECGs may show a moving ST segment during ischemia secondary to dynamic supply versus demand characteristics. A new LBBB is always pathologocal and can be a sign of myocardial infarction. The criteria (Sgarbossa [1]) that can be used in case of a LBBB and suspicion of infarction are:

  • ST elevation > 1mm in leads with a positive QRS complex (concordance in ST deviation) (score 5)
  • ST depression > 1 mm in V1-V3 (concordance in ST deviation) (score 3)
  • ST elevation > 5 mm in leads with a negative QRS complex (inappropriate discordance in ST deviation) (score 2)

At a score-sum of 3, these criteria have a specificity of 90% for detecting a myocardial infarction.

Examples

References

  1. Sgarbossa EB. Value of the ECG in suspected acute myocardial infarction with left bundle branch block. J Electrocardiol. 2000;33 Suppl:87-92. DOI:10.1054/jelc.2000.20324 | PubMed ID:11265742 | HubMed [LBTB]