Conclusion: Difference between revisions

Conclusion (view source)

3 bytes removed , 13 June 2008

no edit summary

7

edits

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Often it is not easy to conclude. Exemples are:
-* "Sinustachycardia with ST elevatie, likely be caused by acute myocardial infarction"
+* "Sinustachycardia with ST elevation, likely caused by acute myocardial infarction"
-* "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 beat per minute caused by an AV nodal re-entry"
+* "Supraventricular tachycardia of 200 beats per minute caused by an AV nodal re-entry"
-* "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with withening of the QRS complexes"
+* "Previous infarction combined with an acute lateral myocard infarction with widening of the QRS complexes"
 * "Normal ECG"
-Final conclusions should be made of one sentense, which sums all important aspects of the ECG. It is not nescecary to mention all 7 aspects, however one have to look at all of them to find the right conclusion!
+Final conclusions should consist of one sentence, which sums all important aspects of the ECG. It is not necessary to mention all 7 aspects, however one has to look at all of them to find the right conclusion!