McGill Case 98: Difference between revisions

McGill Case 98 (view source)

Revision as of 01:25, 15 February 2012

No change in size , 15 February 2012

no edit summary

DarrelC

Administrators

1,943

edits

Revision as of 09:51, 13 February 2012 (view source) DarrelC (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "{{McGillcase\| \|previouspage= McGill Case 97 \|previousname= McGill Case 97 \|nextpage= McGill Case 99 \|nextname= McGill Case 99 }} [[File:E000798.jpg\|thumb\|600px\|left\|This card...")		Revision as of 01:25, 15 February 2012 (view source) DarrelC (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	}}		}}

	[[File:~~E000798~~.jpg\|thumb\|600px\|left\|This cardiogram shows normal VVI pacemaker function. The patient's native EKG seems relatively normal. Of interest notice the "capture beats" where the narrow complexes that are conducted through the A/V node appear earlier than the paced beats but are narrow. This suggests that there is no retrograde conduction from the ventricle to the atrium as the sinus node seems unaffected by the ventricular pacing. This is some what similar to the case of patients with VT where capture beats are seen (very rarely).]]		[[File:E000799.jpg\|thumb\|600px\|left\|This cardiogram shows normal VVI pacemaker function. The patient's native EKG seems relatively normal. Of interest notice the "capture beats" where the narrow complexes that are conducted through the A/V node appear earlier than the paced beats but are narrow. This suggests that there is no retrograde conduction from the ventricle to the atrium as the sinus node seems unaffected by the ventricular pacing. This is some what similar to the case of patients with VT where capture beats are seen (very rarely).]]