ECG as a screening tool

From ECGpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

A recent study among asymptomatic post-menopausal women found an adjusted hazard ratios for CHD events of 1.55 (95% CI, 1.14-2.11) for minor, 3.01 (95% CI, 2.03-4.46) for major ECG abnormalities.[1] This study used a well defined list of major and minor ECG abnormalities that can be used to get a feel for major and minor ECG abnormalities:

Major ECG abnormalities[1][2]:

  1. atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
  2. high-degree atrioventricular dissociation
  3. left bundle-branch block
  4. right bundle-branch block
  5. indeterminate conduction delay
  6. Q-wave MI
  7. isolated ischemic abnormalities
  8. left ventricular hypertrophy with ST-T abnormalities
  9. supraventricular tachycardia
  10. ventricular preexcitation
  11. ventricular tachycardia

Minor ECG abnormalities[1][2]:

  1. first- and second-degree atrioventricular block
  2. borderline prolonged ventricular excitation
  3. prolonged ventricular repolarization
  4. isolated minor Q and ST-T abnormalities
  5. left ventricular hypertrophy without ST-T abnormalities
  6. left atrial enlargement
  7. frequent atrial or ventricular premature beats
  8. fascicular blocks

ECG markers of increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias in ICD patients

In a recent study several ECG risk markers were found to be associated with appropiate therapy in ICD patients[3]:

  • Depressed heart rate variability (HRV) [HR 2.7]
  • BBB with large QRS dispersion of > 39 msec (difference between maximal and minimum QRS across 12 leads) [HR 2.9]
  • Reduced maximal T wave amplitude (<0.4 msec in patients without BBB) [HR 3.8]
  • History of atrial arrhythmias [HR 2.3]

References

  1. Denes P, Larson JC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Prineas RJ, and Greenland P. Major and minor ECG abnormalities in asymptomatic women and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. JAMA. 2007 Mar 7;297(9):978-85. DOI:10.1001/jama.297.9.978 | PubMed ID:17341712 | HubMed [Denes]
  2. Rautaharju PM, Park LP, Chaitman BR, Rautaharju F, and Zhang ZM. The Novacode criteria for classification of ECG abnormalities and their clinically significant progression and regression. J Electrocardiol. 1998 Jul;31(3):157-87. PubMed ID:9682893 | HubMed [novacode]
  3. Shi B, Harding SA, Jimenez A, and Larsen PD. Standard 12-lead electrocardiography measures predictive of increased appropriate therapy in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Europace. 2013 Jun;15(6):892-8. DOI:10.1093/europace/eus360 | PubMed ID:23118007 | HubMed [Shi]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed